top of page

The phantom framework: why risk management rarely meets strategy

  • Autorenbild: Walter Petschnig
    Walter Petschnig
  • 7. Aug.
  • 1 Min. Lesezeit



ree

By Walter Petschnig (06.08.2025)


Honored to Contribute to a Leading International Risk Publication

I’m truly grateful for the opportunity to contribute an article on Strategic Risk Management to one of the most renowned platforms in the global risk community: Strategic Risk Global

I address a persistent challenge in corporate governance: the illusion of integrating risk into strategy. Despite widespread claims, risk management is too often consulted after strategic decisions—rather than shaping them from the outset.

📌 Key Points from the Article:


  • Superficial integration: 64% of firms claim integration, but only 38% apply a documented risk strategy consistently.

  • Cultural and structural gaps: Siloed teams, short-termism, and underdeveloped risk cultures obstruct real impact.

  • The CRO is not invited—must earn the seat: True influence requires communication skills, business acumen, and courage.

  • Strategic reframing is essential: Risk must be seen not only as protection—but as a lever for opportunity, foresight, and competitive advantage.

  • Actionable imperatives: Embed risk in strategic design, invest in capability, normalise scenario thinking, and elevate communication.




Full text: 

 
 
bottom of page